28 September 2001 - The Evidence. Please?
When the US embassies were bombed a few years ago, Ussama bin Laden was blamed, some 'targets' were hit in Afghanistan and a factory was hit in the Sudan. The US Government claimed to have proof that this factory was producing chemical weapons, was strictly guarded by the government and was connected with Ussama bin Laden. The owner of the factory has since sued the US government to have his US assets freed. In the process he used the top independent private investigators (Kroll Associates), trusted by governments worldwide, who showed that his factory had never produced chemical weapons nor their constituents and that he had never had dealings with Ussama bin Laden. The factory was just the largest producer of medicine in Africa. The US court gave the US government 3 months to produce any defence. They failed to present a defence and so the factory owner won the case. He is now suing for damages. The Taliban at that time asked the US for any evidence that Ussama was behind the embassy bombings. It gave the US three months to provide any. None was provided and so they refused to extradite him.
Now we know that some of the people on the list of released names of hijackers involved in the WTC attacks are wrong. They are known to be alive and well. Obviously, some hijackers were using false identities. Not surprisingly, the live and well 'hijackers' are rather nervous. Some people are willing to kill thousands and pin the blame on them. It would be much more convincing if these people didn't exist anymore - and it is not that hard to make people "disappear".
US intelligence, failed with regard to the Sudanese medicine factory and it failed to spot this attack coming. Who can really trust it to be right this time when so much is at stake?
Please, produce your evidence if you have any.
"Who, then, is behind these attacks?" You may well ask. I don't know, but here is a link to an alternative and increasingly credible explanation of current events: